2003-06-23 SvsG Emails

2003 Messages 2002 2003 Overview 2003-01-12 2003-01-27 2003-01-29 2003-02-13 2003-03-02 2003-04-05 2003-04-06 2003-04-21 2003-04-28 2003-05-02 2003-05-05 2003-05-23 2003-06-03 2003-06-04 2003-06-23 2003-06-27 2003-06-28 2003-06-29 2003-07-01 2003-07-13 2003-07-14 2003-07-15 2003-07-24 2003-07-30 2003-08-01 2003-08-02 2003-08-03 2003-08-04 2003-08-25 2003-08-29 2003-08-31 2003-09-01 2003-09-20 2003-09-24 2003-09-25 2003-10-16 2003-10-30 2003-11-01 2003-11-03 2003-11-04 2003-11-05 2003-11-25 2003-11-28 2003-12-09 2004

Staddon vs. Griever: SvsG Messages: 2003

00:05 from Lynne

Message-ID:	<3EF67CA6.9000600spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:05:58 -0400
From:	"Lynne G." <lynnespam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
To:	"N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>, Bubba <b-2024-12-22-07:19-spam@vbzspam.net>
Subject:	Re: the spreadsheet
References:	<3EF6451D.4010608spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>

---

Nick wrote:

What I [think I] verbally agreed to earlier today: Send you my incomplete accounting (done, see attachment) Provide monthly sales accountings, on request Upon receipt of a bill (Word doc is fine) from RDA for their share of the current month's sales, cut check to RDA for 50% of RDA's share for that month (and apply the remainder to RDA's debt in the accounting spreadsheet).

Yes. That is what we agreed upon.

1 and 2 are fine. I will also honor #3 but add that payments cannot go on indefinitely if there is no significant progress on the accounting issue (unless my foot is the one dragging). I think we should at least have gone back and forth a couple of times on the accounting within the next couple of months, with substantial revisions from RDA. If this does not seem reasonable, please tell me so.

I agree that we should have gone back and forth... a long time ago... We can still do that under our current agreement. We do, however, expect you to honor #3 while this process is in progress. Remember that this is a concession on our part, as well, given that we believe that it is you that owes us money.

Thanks for sending the spreadsheet, I will take some time to go over it over the next few days before attempting any response. I have not even opened it, as yet.

Peace,

Lynne

07:49 from Nick

Note

• Attached: VBZ to RDA full accounting 2003-06-23.zip

Text

Message-ID:	<3EF6E949.9010606spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:49:29 -0400
From:	N. Staddon|n|redhouse|com}}
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
To:	Bubba <b-2024-12-22-07:19-spam@vbzspam.net>, lynne-2024-12-22-07:19-spam@redhousespam.com
Subject:	Re: oops
References:	<5.2.0.9.0.20030622232355.00a33550spam@spammail.redhousespam.spamcom>
In-Reply-To:	<5.2.0.9.0.20030622232355.00a33550spam@spammail.redhousespam.spamcom>

---

Apparently there are some minor incompatibilities between Excel and OpenOffice (free & open source clone of MS Office, see openoffice.org), because it looked fine when I re-opened it in OpenOffice but in Excel it showed those "VALUE!" errors.

I've corrected the problem.

N.