2003-06-23 SvsG Emails

From HypertWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2003 Messages

2002
2003 Overview
2003-01-12
2003-01-27
2003-01-29
2003-02-13
2003-03-02
2003-04-05
2003-04-06
2003-04-21
2003-04-28
2003-05-02
2003-05-05
2003-05-23
2003-06-03
2003-06-04
2003-06-23
2003-06-27
2003-06-28
2003-06-29
2003-07-01
2003-07-13
2003-07-14
2003-07-15
2003-07-24
2003-07-30
2003-08-01
2003-08-02
2003-08-03
2003-08-04
2003-08-25
2003-08-29
2003-08-31
2003-09-01
2003-09-20
2003-09-24
2003-09-25
2003-10-16
2003-10-30
2003-11-01
2003-11-03
2003-11-04
2003-11-05
2003-11-25
2003-11-28
2003-12-09
2004

Staddon vs. Griever: SvsG Messages: 2003

00:05 from Lynne

Message-ID: <3EF67CA6.9000600spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:05:58 -0400
From: "Lynne G." <lynnespam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
To: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>, Bubba <b-2022-12-3-16:02-spam@vbzspam.net>
Subject: Re: the spreadsheet
References: <3EF6451D.4010608spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>

Nick wrote:

What I [think I] verbally agreed to earlier today:
  1. Send you my incomplete accounting (done, see attachment)
  2. Provide monthly sales accountings, on request
  3. Upon receipt of a bill (Word doc is fine) from RDA for their share of the current month's sales, cut check to RDA for 50% of RDA's share for that month (and apply the remainder to RDA's debt in the accounting spreadsheet).

Yes. That is what we agreed upon.

1 and 2 are fine. I will also honor #3 but add that payments cannot go on indefinitely if there is no significant progress on the accounting issue (unless my foot is the one dragging). I think we should at least have gone back and forth a couple of times on the accounting within the next couple of months, with substantial revisions from RDA. If this does not seem reasonable, please tell me so.

I agree that we should have gone back and forth... a long time ago... We can still do that under our current agreement. We do, however, expect you to honor #3 while this process is in progress. Remember that this is a concession on our part, as well, given that we believe that it is you that owes us money.

Thanks for sending the spreadsheet, I will take some time to go over it over the next few days before attempting any response. I have not even opened it, as yet.

Peace,

Lynne

07:49 from Nick

Note

  • Attached: VBZ to RDA full accounting 2003-06-23.zip

Text

Message-ID: <3EF6E949.9010606spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:49:29 -0400
From: N. Staddon|n|redhouse|com}}
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
To: Bubba <b-2022-12-3-16:02-spam@vbzspam.net>, lynne-2022-12-3-16:02-spam@redhousespam.com
Subject: Re: oops
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030622232355.00a33550spam@spammail.redhousespam.spamcom>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030622232355.00a33550spam@spammail.redhousespam.spamcom>

Apparently there are some minor incompatibilities between Excel and OpenOffice (free & open source clone of MS Office, see openoffice.org), because it looked fine when I re-opened it in OpenOffice but in Excel it showed those "VALUE!" errors.

I've corrected the problem.

N.