2002-10-26 SvsG emails

From HypertWiki
Revision as of 00:44, 21 February 2007 by Woozle (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2002 Messages

2001
2002 Overview
2002-01-02
2002-01-04
2002-01-05
2002-01-07
2002-01-19
2002-01-23
2002-01-29
2002-02-01
2002-02-03
2002-02-10
2002-02-13
2002-03-06
2002-03-09
2002-03-11
2002-03-19
2002-03-25
2002-04-08
2002-04-11
2002-04-12
2002-04-25
2002-05-08
2002-05-09
2002-05-11
2002-05-17
2002-05-18
2002-05-22
2002-06-13
2002-06-14
2002-06-29
2002-07-01
2002-07-06
2002-07-07
2002-07-10
2002-07-11
2002-07-15
2002-07-18
2002-08-07
2002-08-08
2002-08-10
2002-08-11
2002-08-12
2002-08-13
2002-08-14
2002-08-18
2002-08-21
2002-08-27
2002-08-29
2002-08-30
2002-08-31
2002-09-05
2002-09-06
2002-09-13
2002-09-15
2002-09-16
2002-09-17
2002-09-20
2002-09-21
2002-09-23
2002-09-24
2002-09-26
2002-09-27
2002-09-28
2002-09-29
2002-09-30
2002-10-01
2002-10-02
2002-10-06
2002-10-07
2002-10-11
2002-10-12
2002/10/16
2002-10-24
2002-10-25
2002-10-26
2002-10-29
2002-10-30
2002-10-31
2002-11-02
2002-11-08
2002-11-11
2002-11-12
2002-11-13
2002-11-14
2002-11-15
2002-11-16
2002-11-17
2002-11-22
2002-11-26
2002-11-28
2002-12-01
2002-12-02
2002-12-09
2002-12-11
2002-12-14
2002-12-17
2002-12-23
2003

Staddon vs. Griever: SvsG Messages: 2002

09:03 from Nick

Message-ID: <3DBA92B5.5020400spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:03:49 -0400
From: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020611
To: bubba-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@redhousespam.com
Subject: inventory procedures

When you remove an item from inventory, _please_ make a note of which box it came from. This serves as a cross-check and helps prevent lost or orphaned items. ("lost" = we think it's in a particular box, but it isn't; "orphaned" = it's there, but we think we don't have it).

In the event that we have more than one copy of the same item but in different boxes, I will need to know this information anyway (so I know which box's inventory to deplete).

Thanks,

N.

15:02 from Bubba

Message-ID: <3DBAE6BE.4000002spam@spamvbzspam.spamnet>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:02:22 -0400
From: Bubba <b-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@vbzspam.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
To: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Subject: Re: inventory procedures
References: <3DBA92B5.5020400spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>

N., is this just a thought or are you showing shirts gotten from inventory in more than one place? It's not a bad idea to do what you suggest and I'm wondering if we should coagulate the like designs to eliminate having to come back to the DB to enter where they came from. If they're all in one box then it's an automatic where it came from and whoever pulls it, just pulls it, eliminating another note to miss taking/reporting.

B.