2002-10-07 SvsG emails

From HypertWiki
Revision as of 02:47, 20 February 2007 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (→‎12:19 from Lynne: one more from Lynne)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2002 Messages

2001
2002 Overview
2002-01-02
2002-01-04
2002-01-05
2002-01-07
2002-01-19
2002-01-23
2002-01-29
2002-02-01
2002-02-03
2002-02-10
2002-02-13
2002-03-06
2002-03-09
2002-03-11
2002-03-19
2002-03-25
2002-04-08
2002-04-11
2002-04-12
2002-04-25
2002-05-08
2002-05-09
2002-05-11
2002-05-17
2002-05-18
2002-05-22
2002-06-13
2002-06-14
2002-06-29
2002-07-01
2002-07-06
2002-07-07
2002-07-10
2002-07-11
2002-07-15
2002-07-18
2002-08-07
2002-08-08
2002-08-10
2002-08-11
2002-08-12
2002-08-13
2002-08-14
2002-08-18
2002-08-21
2002-08-27
2002-08-29
2002-08-30
2002-08-31
2002-09-05
2002-09-06
2002-09-13
2002-09-15
2002-09-16
2002-09-17
2002-09-20
2002-09-21
2002-09-23
2002-09-24
2002-09-26
2002-09-27
2002-09-28
2002-09-29
2002-09-30
2002-10-01
2002-10-02
2002-10-06
2002-10-07
2002-10-11
2002-10-12
2002/10/16
2002-10-24
2002-10-25
2002-10-26
2002-10-29
2002-10-30
2002-10-31
2002-11-02
2002-11-08
2002-11-11
2002-11-12
2002-11-13
2002-11-14
2002-11-15
2002-11-16
2002-11-17
2002-11-22
2002-11-26
2002-11-28
2002-12-01
2002-12-02
2002-12-09
2002-12-11
2002-12-14
2002-12-17
2002-12-23
2003

Staddon vs. Griever: SvsG Messages: 2002

11:06 from Nick

Message-ID: <3DA1A2FE.9030407spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:06:38 -0400
From: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020611
To: team-2024-11-23-23:09-spam@vbzspam.net
Subject: check finding

In case this helps locate the check...

N. [ content here was a customer's email; redacted ]

12:19 from Lynne

Message-ID: <3DA1B40C.9040803spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:19:24 -0400
From: "Lynne G." <lynnespam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
To: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Subject: Re: check finding
References: <3DA1A2FE.9030407spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>

N. Staddon wrote:

In case this helps locate the check...

N.

[ customer message redacted ]

Nick...

So you'll know... there was mail on your bed, as well... I started the envelope thing quite a while ago... but initially I thought you were ovnly leaving for the weekend.... I would check around to be sure it's not there in your covers...or something...

Lynne

12:20 from Lynne

Message-ID: <3DA1B45B.8090004spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:20:43 -0400
From: "Lynne G." <lynnespam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
To: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Subject: Re: check finding
References: "3DA1A2FE.9030407" <redhousespam@spamcomspam.spam{{{4}}}>

Also, are you sure it wasn't sent to 2895 Danielsville?

18:58 from Nick

Preface

This letter was written the morning after arriving at Hull Road for what I think was a planned meeting.

Text

Message-ID: <3DA182F6.8040100spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 08:49:58 -0400
From: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020611
To: "" <teamspam@spamvbzspam.spamnet>
Subject: neglected items & good news

First, the negative agenda items I forgot --

1. Hopefully this won't be a big issue, but there's a twice-overdue gas bill for 1242 Hull Rd. in my mail pile. I'd pay it if I had the cash, but I don't.

Bill was due 9/24
past due at that time: $76.18
total due at that time: $119.24

Let me know to whom I should give this bill. (I'm surprised it was in my pile, actually; it had been opened, so someone knew it was for Hull Rd. If anyone was expecting me to pay it, they should have at least emailed me about it.)

2. I would still like the keys to the Benz. If you keep copies of the keys and can get it repaired, I will credit the Benz account (not yet compiled) for the repairs -- we can figure that amount pretty much however you want, within reason. We also still have to negotiate over the months it was out of service but in your possession.

(The RDA position, as I understand it, is that RDA couldn't use it, so why should they pay rent on it? My position is that nobody said "we're terminating our rental effective mm/dd, please make a note of this" (much less returning the keys, which is generally required when terminating a car rental) thus letting me know the car was back in my hands, because I understood you were going to repair it and continue renting/driving it, and you were wayyy behind on the rent upon which I was depending if I was going to handle repair/replacement, not to mention auto insurance -- which has now lapsed for non-payment -- and and and and <fx of me tearing my hair>.)

But however we resolve it, I need the keys.

3. A business issue -- [name of customer redacted] says she sent payment for a large-ish order. Bubba says he hasn't seen it. It may be a money order, in which case she may have a very hard time recovering the money and sending it in again. We really need to scour all the places where mail might have accumulated and make sure we really haven't received it. It was at least $60, which we could really use right now, for stuff which I believe we have in stock.

I will be changing the mailing address for orders (on the web site) to Durham; I feel confident that business mail arriving there will be brought to my attention in a timely way and will not be mislaid.

4. The good news -- the deposits for the ZR shipment have now appeared in the bank queue, and "available balance" is now positive $20 or so. No further NSFs were charged and no other debits have appeared (yet).

Guess that's all for now...

Thanks,

N.