2002-09-21 SvsG emails

From HypertWiki
Revision as of 02:54, 19 February 2007 by Woozle (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2002 Messages

2001
2002 Overview
2002-01-02
2002-01-04
2002-01-05
2002-01-07
2002-01-19
2002-01-23
2002-01-29
2002-02-01
2002-02-03
2002-02-10
2002-02-13
2002-03-06
2002-03-09
2002-03-11
2002-03-19
2002-03-25
2002-04-08
2002-04-11
2002-04-12
2002-04-25
2002-05-08
2002-05-09
2002-05-11
2002-05-17
2002-05-18
2002-05-22
2002-06-13
2002-06-14
2002-06-29
2002-07-01
2002-07-06
2002-07-07
2002-07-10
2002-07-11
2002-07-15
2002-07-18
2002-08-07
2002-08-08
2002-08-10
2002-08-11
2002-08-12
2002-08-13
2002-08-14
2002-08-18
2002-08-21
2002-08-27
2002-08-29
2002-08-30
2002-08-31
2002-09-05
2002-09-06
2002-09-13
2002-09-15
2002-09-16
2002-09-17
2002-09-20
2002-09-21
2002-09-23
2002-09-24
2002-09-26
2002-09-27
2002-09-28
2002-09-29
2002-09-30
2002-10-01
2002-10-02
2002-10-06
2002-10-07
2002-10-11
2002-10-12
2002/10/16
2002-10-24
2002-10-25
2002-10-26
2002-10-29
2002-10-30
2002-10-31
2002-11-02
2002-11-08
2002-11-11
2002-11-12
2002-11-13
2002-11-14
2002-11-15
2002-11-16
2002-11-17
2002-11-22
2002-11-26
2002-11-28
2002-12-01
2002-12-02
2002-12-09
2002-12-11
2002-12-14
2002-12-17
2002-12-23
2003

Staddon vs. Griever: SvsG Messages: 2002

11:56 from Bubba

Notes

To the best of my recollection as of 2007-02-18:

  • We had discussed the idea of "being the phone room for our suppliers on weekends" and, predictably, they weren't interested, already having their own well-staffed phone rooms on site and not really expecting many orders on weekends.
  • We had discussed the idea of separate bank accounts, but repeatedly ran up against the fact that we simply didn't have enough cash to keep even one bank account in the positive on a reliable basis, much less three

So I'm not sure what Bubba's point is in bringing up these issues as if further discussion could actually solve anything.

Message

Message-ID: <3D8C9699.2060300spam@spamvbzspam.spamnet>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:56:09 -0400
From: Bubba <b-2024-11-22-14:36-spam@vbzspam.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
To: "N. Staddon" <nspam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>
Subject: Re: my shirt and hat
References: <116.1772f823.2abcf7easpam@spamaolspam.spamcom> <3D8BA2E3.4020706spam@spamvbzspam.spamnet> <3D8C8D40.3070604spam@spamredhousespam.spamcom>

N., didn't place the order as per Lynnes reporting of the bank account status. This is why I want an account just for the orders. One that only I have access to (not needing just MY name on the account, just one y'all won't touch) for orders. You have auto debits and Lynne has to juggle. If I had an account that neither one of you could use I'd keep it balanced and y'all could look at it when ever you wanted. Once Lynne starts juggling, I give it (bank account) up. And by the same token, if withdrawls are made w/o my knowledge I can't keep up w/it. That's why I don't use an ATM card. Forgetting to write in withdrawls (I'll remember it later, I gotta go! syndrome) I should have placed it and the consequences be damned, at least hte customer would have been taken care of.

I will place it Mon morn and ship it Blue label. This is where being the phone room for our suppliers on weekends could generate $ and we could just enter the orders through our system.

Apologies (I'm tired of using that word),

B.