2000-11-10 SvsG Emails

From HypertWiki
Revision as of 01:08, 17 October 2005 by Woozle (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2000 Messages

1999
2000-05-30
2000-09-13
2000-10-02
2000-11-06
2000-11-10
2000-11-13
2001

Staddon vs. Griever: SvsG Messages: 2000

14:13 from Nick

From: <Nick.Staddon-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@carrier.utcspam.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 14:10:08 -0500
Message-ID: <00467918.C22115spam@spamcarrier.utcspam.spamcom>
Subject: another one
To: Bubba <bubba-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@redhousespam.com>
Cc: me <nick-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@redhousespam.com>

http://www.mindspring.com/~mraging/page1.html

Probably iron-ons... but maybe worth looking into.

N.

16:09 from Nick

From: <Nick.Staddon-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@carrier.utcspam.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:53:55 -0500
Message-ID: <00467909.C22115spam@spamcarrier.utcspam.spamcom>
Subject: t-shirtshopper
To: Bubba <bubba-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@redhousespam.com>
Cc: me <nick-2024-11-22-13:39-spam@redhousespam.com>

Our hits from them are sluggish -- less than 5 a day as far as I can tell -- and nobody's rated us (or at any rate our points haven't changed). I'm wondering if we should add "searchable" to our description, and/or drop the slightly-cheesy exclamation points (people might feel they've "discovered" something if they find us at the bottom of the page)...

Just a thot...

N.