Kestrel Heights

This is a review of the Kestrel Heights charter school based on an open-house visit on 2008-01-30. We spent maybe an hour sitting in on 3 classrooms, with a group of maybe 5 kids (all of Central Park School's 5th grade was visiting, but we split up).

Quick Summary

The academics seemed pretty good. I was less impressed by some of the social policies, especially the dress code, but those are only likely to cause problems for some kids.

Dress Code

Kestrel Heights has a dress code which is about one step short of "uniform only":

...polo, Henley, or turtleneck style pullover shirts (long or short sleeved) in solid white, red, navy, or dark green colors with khaki or navy blue bottoms (pants/shorts/skirts/skorts/jumpers). Students may wear sweatshirts or sweaters (in shirt colors); no jackets are allowed inside the school. Not allowed are clothing with logos or printing of any kind; please refer to the Code of Conduct for additional details of the dress code.

It was also mentioned verbally that shirts must be tucked in at all times (something I hated doing, and never do as an adult); there may be other details in the official handbook.

It may be that they are not excessively strict in enforcing this. In the gymnasium, for example, we saw two students wearing white t-shirts with writing on the back (maybe this is allowed for gym classes only?). In the classrooms, we saw students wearing hoodie-style jackets, though I think these were all official Kestrel Heights attire, as I saw the KH logo on at least one of them. There were also other outer garments, e.g. ponchos.

The teacher who introduced us to the school (Mr. Credle) said that the dress code was for two specific reasons:

1. preventing gangs by preventing clothing associated with gang membership
2. preventing teasing by disallowing "fashion" clothing – "Everybody looks alike,", he said, "and if everybody looks alike, then nobody can tease anyone for looking different." (To paraphrase slightly; "everybody looks alike" is an exact quote, however.)

This strikes me as totally bogus, and I'd like to know if they have any data to support this. My own experience suggests the opposite, at least as far as the "teasing" issue goes; for this and other reasons, it seems to me that a dress code actually works against the stated goals:

• My own experience: at Durham Academy, where there was also a dress code (albeit somewhat milder than Kestrel's), there was no end of teasing -- about, for example, my choice of brand in shoes (not something regulated by Kestrel's code). At CFS, on the other hand, where there was no dress code (their current dress policy is, essentially, that clothing should be "clean, comfortable, and appropriate"), the emphasis was on positive reinforcement. If you didn't choose to dress up or be fashionable, that was fine and nobody made anything out of it.
• By emphasizing the value of conformity and uniformity, a dress code (especially when put in terms like "everyone looks the same"), they implicitly give backing to the idea that deviation should not be tolerated.
• By focusing on conformity to a dress code, the school may be overlooking other more effective ways of preventing teasing; my favorite method is to promote an atmosphere of tolerance by emphasizing that people are different and that it takes many different kinds of people to make the world work. The time and energy they spend dealing with dress code enforcement may take away from time and energy better spent preventing teasing in this or other ways.
• Gangs have many other ways of indicating membership, and I have a hard time believing that a dress code would be a major factor in preventing them from gaining members. There may be solid data showing it to be an effective measure, but I haven't seen it.