2002-12-02 SvsG emails: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m →13:17 from Bubba: redacted acct # (oopsy) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
ahunnerrd dollllers) into our BB&T account when you go to the bank would | ahunnerrd dollllers) into our BB&T account when you go to the bank would | ||
be the quickest way to do it unless you can do it online. The account # | be the quickest way to do it unless you can do it online. The account # | ||
is | is [{{faint|redacted}}]. | ||
Thnx. | Thnx. | ||
B. | B. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:15, 23 February 2007
Staddon vs. Griever: SvsG Messages: 2002
13:17 from Bubba
| Message-ID: | <3DEBA3B3.9020906@vbz.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:17:23 -0500 |
| From: | Bubba <b@vbz.net> |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 |
| To: | "N. Staddon" <n@redhouse.com>, lynne@redhouse.com |
| Subject: | Re: Sandy's check? |
| References: | <3DEA8C0D.5060601@redhouse.com> |
N. Staddon wrote:
|
Did Sandy's check for the cat de-nutsification ever show up? How did that get paid for? How are the cats doing? Should she stop payment on the check? Thanks, N. for us@Durham |
N., no it hasn't. I can only think I threw it away in a pockets cleaning session. It might have been wrapped up in some notes I had in there that were no longer relevant to reality. So, yes go ahead and stop payment. We wrote a check to the vet for it and were sposed to take the other male in today but we were in ATl and will schedule it for tomorrow. A re-issuance minus costs of stopping payment (abou..about ahunnerrd dollllers) into our BB&T account when you go to the bank would be the quickest way to do it unless you can do it online. The account # is [redacted].
Thnx.
B.
