Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/blog/2009-09-05 0823 Balancing without a paddle"

From HypertWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(9:47 update, 9:58 update)
(10:06 update - solution)
Line 19: Line 19:
* '''09:47''' Bank statements are available online, and the last one was 8/15 -- where my balance agrees with theirs. So we just have to look at a little over 2 weeks -- some 33 transactions.
* '''09:47''' Bank statements are available online, and the last one was 8/15 -- where my balance agrees with theirs. So we just have to look at a little over 2 weeks -- some 33 transactions.
* '''09:58''' Downloaded a CSV of the last month of transactions, plonked it into OpenOffice, ran the balance forward from 8/15 -- and it agrees with the bank's balance ($1007.26). So now I can compare the balance line-by-line and see where the discrepancy pops up. It's after the $2490.43, because it still agrees at that point. That just leaves a dozen or so lines...
* '''09:58''' Downloaded a CSV of the last month of transactions, plonked it into OpenOffice, ran the balance forward from 8/15 -- and it agrees with the bank's balance ($1007.26). So now I can compare the balance line-by-line and see where the discrepancy pops up. It's after the $2490.43, because it still agrees at that point. That just leaves a dozen or so lines...
* '''10:06''' Turned out to be simple enough -- in my haste, I somehow didn't reconcile the last 3 transactions. They were already accounted for in my figuring through to next week, but not in the balance I was comparing to... so I won't go negative, as I suspected.
</let>
</let>


<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2009-09-05 0823</let>
<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2009-09-05 0823</let>
</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including>{{:project:code/lib/data}}<call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>
</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including>{{:project:code/lib/data}}<call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>

Revision as of 14:24, 5 September 2009

FLAG VALUE=[including]