SvsG Proposed Ground Rules

Plaintiffs' proposed ground rules for negotiation between litigants in Staddon vs. Griever.

Negotiation About Ground Rules

Plaintiff agrees to the following rules and terminology, in the hopes of arriving at a set of Ground Rules which are agreeable to both parties:

• Defendants may request or demand changes.
• For each change requested or demanded by Defendants, Plaintiff will consider three possibilities:
  1. making the change exactly as stated, knowing that the Defendants would then have no cause for further grievance on the issue raised;
  2. making a counter-proposal (request), knowing that this risks further disagreements over the issue raised, taking time and effort from both parties and possibly resulting in failure to agree
  3. denying the request, knowing that:
     • If the change was a request, the Defendants may be unwilling to consider agreeing to the ground rules resulting from said denial
     • If the change was a demand, then Plaintiffs' denial of the request essentially brings all further negotiation to an end.
• If it so happens that neither party has any requests or demands for changes, then the Ground Rules will be taken as accepted by both parties.

Negotiation on the Case at Hand

Notes

• Where something is said to be "stated", it is to be understood that this means "written down as part of the document currently being described".
• Where no response is received within the stated time, it will be assumed that the non-responding party disagrees with all statements or changes made by the document not responded to, and it will be assumed that the non-responding party does not wish to amend or alter their most recent response in any way. If a non-responding party have not yet made any responses within the Ground Rules, then their lack of response shall be construed as disagreement with all points in the submitted document, with no alterations suggested, and the negotiations shall revert to the condition they were in before acceptance of these Ground Rules (which was, as of this writing, Mediation as ordered by the Court).
• All communication shall pass from each party to their respective attorney, who will relay it to the opposing attorney, who will in turn relay it to her/his client.
• It shall be understood that each party must notify their attorney of the date of receipt of each document within 2 business days of said receipt, via whatever method they prefer, and that said attorney must notify the opposing attorney of same within 2 business days, and that the opposing attorney will in turn notify her/his client of same within 2 business days. (This process should lead to a delay of no more than 6 business days, or 10 calendar days, between the receipt of a document by one party and the other party's notification of said receipt.)

Overview

• Phase I: Plaintiff sends initial proposal of facts, and Defendants respond
• Phase II: Plaintiff responds to Defendants' responses
• Phase III: Litigants work out a clear statement of their respective positions
• Phase IV: Litigants now have a list of clear disagreements, so they now provide documentation towards each point
• Phase V: Litigants review each other's evidence lists, ask for physical or detailed copies if needed, and decide whether to adjust their positions (back to Phase II), ask for more evidence (stay in Phase V), or maintain their positions (move on to Phase VI-B).
• Phase VI-A: Plaintiff and Defendants were able to reach an agreement on all points. Plaintiff and Defendants decide whether to mutually agree to a settlement or instead to enter into Binding Arbitration to determine a fair settlement.
• Phase VI-B: Plaintiff and Defendants have each presented the other with documents to argue their side, but differences still remain; Plaintiff and Defendants enter into Binding Arbitration for a determination of facts and a fair settlement in light of the determined facts.

Rules

Phase I

1. Plaintiff will prepare an Initial Statement giving:
   • A set of facts which Plaintiff believes to be true
   • A set of conclusions which Plaintiff believes would follow logically if the given facts were true
2. Plaintiff will submit said document to Defendants no later than 7 (seven) calendar days after ground rules are agreed upon.

Phase II

1. Defendants will respond to said document within 14 (fourteen) calendar days, indicating:
   • Their agreement or disagreement with each stated fact
   • Any additional facts which they believe to be relevant but which were not included in the Plaintiff's document
   • Their agreement or disagreement with the reasoning of each conclusion (i.e. is the conclusion a reasonable one to draw if the facts were correct?)
   • Their agreement or disagreement with the factuality of each conclusion (i.e. regardless of the soundness of the reasoning, is the conclusion true?)
   • The nature or substance of each disagreement, i.e. a detailing of what, specifically, is incorrect about the statement as written, and how it should be rewritten in order to be true. These particular responses shall be known as "Suggested Changes".

Phase III

1. Within 14 (fourteen) calendar days of receiving Defendants' response, Plaintiff will prepare a Revised Statement document which shall state, for each Suggested Change made by the Defendants, whether the Plaintiff believes the Suggested Change is incorrect, is unclear, or is correct.
   • For each Suggested Change marked "unclear", the Plaintiff will suggest a re-wording with which the Plaintiff agrees.
   • Plaintiff may state any additional facts which may help to clarify Plaintiff's point of view.
2. If Plaintiff marks all Suggested Changes as "correct", negotiation moves directly to Phase VI-A.
3. If Plaintiff marks any Suggested Changes as "unclear" or states any additional facts, negotiation returns to Phase II, with the Plaintiff's Revised Statement being given to the Defendants in the same manner as the Plaintiff's Initial Statement.
4. If Plaintiff marks all Suggested Changes as either "correct" or "incorrect", with no Suggested Changes being marked as "unclear" and no additional facts stated, the Revised Statement becomes a Dispute Statement and negotiation moves directly to Phase IV.

Phase IV

• Note: There should be only "correct" and "incorrect" items remaining on the Revised Statement at this point.

1. Within 14 (fourteen) calendar days of the Defendants' receipt of the Dispute Statement, Plaintiff and Defendants will each prepare an Evidence List Document (i.e. one such document from the Plaintiff and one from the Defendants) and present said Evidence List Document to the other party.
2. Each Evidence List Document will name and describe, for each Suggested Change which the Plaintiff has marked "incorrect":
   • Any item of physical evidence supporting the authoring party's point of view
   • Any communications records supporting the authoring party's point of view, including the date, time, and medium (email, letter, phone call, etc.) of such email, as well as the essential substance of the record indicating how it supports the authoring party's point

Phase V

Pre-Note: There are still only "incorrect" and "correct" items on the list at this point

1. Within 14 (fourteen) calendar days of both parties' receipt of the other party's Evidence List Documents, each shall produce an Evidence Response Document indicating, for each Evidence Item on the Evidence List Document:
   • For the Evidence Item itself, the document shall provisionally indicate either an acceptance of the Evidence Item as genuine, a request for display of the Evidence Item specifying the nature of the display desired , or a rejection of the Evidence Item as fraudulent.
   • If the Evidence Item is accepted as genuine, then additionally either an acceptance that the Evidence Item argues the presenter's point, or a refutation arguing that it does not.
2. If either party, within 14 (fourteen) calendar days of receiving the other party's Evidence Response Document, wishes to concede any additional points or make Suggested Changes, then either:
   • Plaintiff may submit a Revised Statement as in Phase III, in which case negotiations resume at Phase III, or
   • Defendants may submit a revised Statement Response as in Phase II, in which case negotiations resume at Phase II.
   • If both parties submit documents (a Revised Statement from the Plaintiff and a revised Statement Response from the Defendants), then the Plaintiff shall issue a second Revised Statement taking into account the revised Statement Response from the Defendants, and negotiations shall resume at Phase II.

Notes to self: at this point, either party may want to go back to phase II/III and revise their statements/responses. If that doesn't happen, then either party may want to submit additional evidence, in which case we restart Phase V. If none of these things happen, then we have (a) agreement on which points are in contention, and (b) understanding of which evidence is accepted and which isn't, and (c) understanding of which evidence-based arguments are accepted and which are not, and finally (d) no further room for negotiation... so we go to VI-B. Just need to phrase all that in sharper language.

Notes:

• "nature of the display": e.g. for email, a complete unedited copy with all headers; for receipts and other paperwork, the respondant may be satisfied with a photocopy or may ask to see the original; other reasonable forms of display may be specified by the party requesting the display
• "provisionally indicate": acceptance of an Evidence Item as genuine shall not be construed as surrendering the right to request a display later on. nor shall requesting one type of display be construed as surrendering the right to request other types at a later time.

Phase VI-B

Editing is currently in progress on this article. Although editing is incomplete, the author or editor has saved their work to prevent loss. Please check back later by reloading the page, and do not edit while this message is still showing. Thank you.