Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/blog/2011-01-18 2123 Obamacare myth the fifth"

From HypertWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Chuck now has a wiki page.)
(addendum: Kaiser Health Tracking Poll -- April 2012)
Line 37: Line 37:
One has to wonder what the results would have been had that question been asked in the earlier polls: how much of that a-bit-more-than-half opposition -- now being framed as support for ''repealing the reform altogether'' -- was opposition ''in the hope of getting something better passed?''
One has to wonder what the results would have been had that question been asked in the earlier polls: how much of that a-bit-more-than-half opposition -- now being framed as support for ''repealing the reform altogether'' -- was opposition ''in the hope of getting something better passed?''


{{footnote/target|3}} http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/12/27/rel17h.pdf via {{wikipedia|Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act#Public_opinions_and_views}}</let>
{{footnote/target|3}} http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/12/27/rel17h.pdf via {{wikipedia|Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act#Public_opinions_and_views}}
 
==Addendum==
* Slide 14 of the "Chartpack" PDF linked from [http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/8302.cfm this page] (the results of a Kaiser Health Tracking Poll in April 2012) indicates clearly that most people are in favor of the actual ''provisions'' of Obamacare. (There's data elsewhere which indicates that approval goes down among people who are aware that the provision named is ''part of Obamacare''.)
</let>
<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2011-01-18 2123</let>
<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2011-01-18 2123</let>
</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including>{{:project:code/lib/data}}<call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>
</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including>{{:project:code/lib/data}}<call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>

Revision as of 18:08, 28 June 2012

FLAG VALUE=[including]