User:Woozle/blog/2010/01/28/1638 The Eternal Residential Placement Catch-22 - Revision history

Woozle: Replaced content with "{{page/blog/post}}"

2022-09-20T17:30:08Z

Replaced content with "{{page/blog/post}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 20 September 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<hide>~~		{{page/blog/post}}
	~~<let name=data index=Title>The Eternal Residential Placement Catch-22<~~/~~let>~~
	~~<let name=data index=User>Woozle<~~/~~let>~~
	~~<let name=data index=TopicsUser></let>~~
	~~<let name=data index=TopicsGlobal>\Josh\group homes\bureaucracy</let>~~
	<let name=data index=TextAbove>We just heard back from [[Residential Services Inc]], a group home in Chapel Hill which came highly recommended and with whom I spoke [[2010/01/27\|last night]] for about half an hour.</let>
	<let name=data index=TextBelow>At the time we spoke, they agreed that [[Josh]] needed an [[ICF]]-level care facility, and the social worker I spoke with seemed optimistic that they might have a place for him. She said that the evaluation team would be meeting today and she would call back to let me know what they said.

	Today she called back, and what they said was that they felt they didn't have adequate facilities to serve him, largely because of his "history of running" and I think she also mentioned the violence he still occasionally displays. I asked her who she thought we should be talking to that ''would'' have adequate facilities, and she suggested the Murdoch Center.

	~~This is ironic, because we've already tried them -- and they said Josh [[Murdoch Center\|wasn't severe ''enough'']] for them.~~

	~~I told her that, and she recommended a couple of other places which I am still investigating:~~
	* [[RHA Howell Care Centers, Inc]] in LaGrange, NC, which appears to have no web site (only a [http://nc.serviceslisted.com/4730704-HowellsChildCareCenterCorporateOffice.htm listing] or three)
	* [[Ralph Scott Lifeservices, Inc]] in Burlington, whose [http://www.rsli.org/ web site] appears to be down as of this typing (perhaps I should offer them hosting?)

	I think what needs to happen is that at the [[2010/02/09\|care review meeting]], we need to very pointedly ask what service providers ''would'' be appropriate for Josh, now that we know which ones ''aren't''?

	~~...and then focus our efforts on those.~~
	~~</let>~~

	~~<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010/01/28 1638</let>~~
	~~</hide><noinclude><if not flag=$including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>~~

Woozle: Text replace - "flag=including" to "flag=$including"

2013-01-20T03:30:04Z

Text replace - "flag=including" to "flag=$including"

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 20 January 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010/01/28 1638</let>		<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010/01/28 1638</let>
	</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>		</hide><noinclude><if not flag=$including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>

Woozle: update timestamp format

2011-09-27T22:42:24Z

update timestamp format

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 27 September 2011
Line 20:		Line 20:
	</let>		</let>

	<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010-01-28 1638</let>		<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010/01/28 1638</let>
	</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>		</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>

Woozle: moved User:Woozle/blog/2010-01-28 1638 The Eternal Residential Placement Catch-22 to User:Woozle/blog/2010/01/28/1638 The Eternal Residential Placement Catch-22: subpage-compatible name

2011-09-27T22:41:48Z

moved User:Woozle/blog/2010-01-28 1638 The Eternal Residential Placement Catch-22 to User:Woozle/blog/2010/01/28/1638 The Eternal Residential Placement Catch-22: subpage-compatible name

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 27 September 2011
(No difference)

Woozle: load of lib page no longer necessary

2011-09-15T21:23:56Z

load of lib page no longer necessary

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 15 September 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:

	<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010-01-28 1638</let>		<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010-01-28 1638</let>
	</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including>~~{{:project:code/lib/data}}~~<call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>		</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including><call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>

Woozle: new page from form at http://wiki.hypertwins.org/HypertWiki:Forms/blog/post

2010-01-28T21:43:21Z

new page from form at http://wiki.hypertwins.org/HypertWiki:Forms/blog/post

New page

<hide>
<let name=data index=Title>The Eternal Residential Placement Catch-22</let>
<let name=data index=User>Woozle</let>
<let name=data index=TopicsUser></let>
<let name=data index=TopicsGlobal>\Josh\group homes\bureaucracy</let>
<let name=data index=TextAbove>We just heard back from [[Residential Services Inc]], a group home in Chapel Hill which came highly recommended and with whom I spoke [[2010/01/27|last night]] for about half an hour.</let>
<let name=data index=TextBelow>At the time we spoke, they agreed that [[Josh]] needed an [[ICF]]-level care facility, and the social worker I spoke with seemed optimistic that they might have a place for him. She said that the evaluation team would be meeting today and she would call back to let me know what they said.

Today she called back, and what they said was that they felt they didn't have adequate facilities to serve him, largely because of his "history of running" and I think she also mentioned the violence he still occasionally displays. I asked her who she thought we should be talking to that ''would'' have adequate facilities, and she suggested the Murdoch Center.

This is ironic, because we've already tried them -- and they said Josh [[Murdoch Center|wasn't severe ''enough'']] for them.

I told her that, and she recommended a couple of other places which I am still investigating:
* [[RHA Howell Care Centers, Inc]] in LaGrange, NC, which appears to have no web site (only a [http://nc.serviceslisted.com/4730704-HowellsChildCareCenterCorporateOffice.htm listing] or three)
* [[Ralph Scott Lifeservices, Inc]] in Burlington, whose [http://www.rsli.org/ web site] appears to be down as of this typing (perhaps I should offer them hosting?)

I think what needs to happen is that at the [[2010/02/09|care review meeting]], we need to very pointedly ask what service providers ''would'' be appropriate for Josh, now that we know which ones ''aren't''?

...and then focus our efforts on those.
</let>

<let name=data index=TimeStamp>2010-01-28 1638</let>
</hide><noinclude><if not flag=including>{{:project:code/lib/data}}<call ShowBlogPostPage></if></noinclude>