<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://hypertwins.org/mw/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ASvsG_Proposed_Ground_Rules</id>
	<title>Talk:SvsG Proposed Ground Rules - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://hypertwins.org/mw/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ASvsG_Proposed_Ground_Rules"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://hypertwins.org/mw/index.php?title=Talk:SvsG_Proposed_Ground_Rules&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-25T17:24:18Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://hypertwins.org/mw/index.php?title=Talk:SvsG_Proposed_Ground_Rules&amp;diff=5177&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>24.136.238.245 at 20:01, 28 October 2005</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://hypertwins.org/mw/index.php?title=Talk:SvsG_Proposed_Ground_Rules&amp;diff=5177&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2005-10-28T20:01:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The following was originally posted on the same page with the proposed ground rules, but at the present time it seems likely that we will be working out the ground rules face-to-face (if they are to be used at all) with a mediator present, so spelling out meta-rules seems unnecessary. I&amp;#039;ll keep them here, though, in case they are useful later. --[[User:24.136.238.245|24.136.238.245]] 16:01, 28 Oct 2005 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Negotiation About Ground Rules==&lt;br /&gt;
Plaintiff agrees to the following rules and terminology, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;in the hopes of arriving at&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a set of Ground Rules which are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;agreeable to both parties&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
* Defendants may &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;request&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; or &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;demand&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; changes.&lt;br /&gt;
* For each change &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;requested&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; or &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;demanded&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by Defendants, Plaintiff will consider three possibilities:&lt;br /&gt;
*# making the change exactly as stated, knowing that the Defendants would then have no cause for further grievance on the issue raised;&lt;br /&gt;
*# making a counter-proposal (request), knowing that this risks further disagreements over the issue raised, taking time and effort from both parties and possibly resulting in failure to agree&lt;br /&gt;
*# denying the request, knowing that:&lt;br /&gt;
*#* If the change was a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;request&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the Defendants may be unwilling to consider agreeing to the ground rules resulting from said denial&lt;br /&gt;
*#* If the change was a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;demand&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, then Plaintiffs&amp;#039; denial of the request essentially brings all further negotiation to an end.&lt;br /&gt;
* If it so happens that neither party has any requests or demands for changes, then the Ground Rules will be taken as accepted by both parties.&lt;br /&gt;
==Negotiation on the Case at Hand==&lt;br /&gt;
(actual proposed rules go here)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>24.136.238.245</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>