Griever/accounting - Revision history

Woozle: /* Documents */ removed surplus brackets

2015-08-15T18:29:46Z

Documents: removed surplus brackets

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 15 August 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:
	** {{l/sub\|2003}} Accounting		** {{l/sub\|2003}} Accounting
	* Service Accounts:		* Service Accounts:
	** {{l/sub\|Benz}} Rental Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|Benz}} Rental Accounting
	** {{l/sub\|storage}} Rental Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|storage}} Rental Accounting
	** Legal Fees: see {{l/sub\|2005}}		** Legal Fees: see {{l/sub\|2005}}
	* "On Spec" Project:		* "On Spec" Project:

Woozle: link updates

2015-08-15T17:21:50Z

link updates

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 15 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{hdr/Griever/accountings}}		{{hdr/Griever/accountings}}
	==Documents==		==Documents==
	*~~[[SvsG:Accounting Summary]]~~ - yearly totals and final total		* {{l/sub\|summary}} - yearly totals and final total
	*General Accountings:		* General Accountings:
	**~~[[SvsG:~~1997 ~~Accounting]]~~		** {{l/sub\|1997}}
	**~~[[SvsG:~~1998 Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|1998}} Accounting
	**~~[[SvsG:~~1999 Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|1999}} Accounting
	**~~[[SvsG:~~2000 Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|2000}} Accounting
	**~~[[SvsG:~~2001 Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|2001}} Accounting
	**~~[[SvsG:~~2002 Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|2002}} Accounting
	**~~[[SvsG:~~2003 Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|2003}} Accounting
	*Service Accounts:		* Service Accounts:
	**~~[[SvsG:~~Benz Rental Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|Benz}} Rental Accounting]]
	**~~[[SvsG:Storage~~ Rental Accounting]]		** {{l/sub\|storage}} Rental Accounting]]
	**~~[[SvsG:~~Legal Fees]]		** Legal Fees: see {{l/sub\|2005}}
	*"On Spec" Project:		* "On Spec" Project:
	**[[~~SvsG:~~Xmas CD ~~Accounting~~]] - not ~~yet started; does not affect total~~		** [[Xmas CD Project]] Accounting: - this is probably not doable at this point
	* Other related documents:		* Other related documents:
	** [[~~SvsG:Checks Available~~]]		** [[/checks]]: index to listings and images of bank checks

	"Accounts" are where there was a simple agreement to provide a service in exchange for a fee. Each one ended up with a net amount due from the Defendants to the Plaintiff.		"Accounts" are where there was a simple agreement to provide a service in exchange for a fee. Each one ended up with a net amount due from the Defendants to the Plaintiff.
Line 26:		Line 26:
	===RDA Disputes===		===RDA Disputes===
	RDA disputes the following entries (as taken from notes on the printouts copied by the defense lawyer); my responses are [[#Nick Responds\|below]].		RDA disputes the following entries (as taken from notes on the printouts copied by the defense lawyer); my responses are [[#Nick Responds\|below]].
	====~~[[SvsG:1998 Accounting~~\|1998]]-~~[[SvsG:1999 Accounting~~\|1999]]====		===={{l/sub\|1998}}-{{l/sub\|1999}}====
	No known disputes as of this writing.		No known disputes as of this writing.
	====~~[[SvsG:2000 Accounting~~\|2000]]====		===={{l/sub\|2000}}====
	:'''1.''' "Nick shows an 'emergency loan' on 9/27 and re-payment on 10/9 and adds both to the list of alleged debts. Instead of cancelling out the $350, it doubles it." In other words, the 10/9 repayment should be credited to Defendants. There is also a note next to the 10/9 "NS/BofD #958" entry saying "2 EL's for $350????", which I think is a reiteration of this same comment.		: '''1.''' "Nick shows an 'emergency loan' on 9/27 and re-payment on 10/9 and adds both to the list of alleged debts. Instead of cancelling out the $350, it doubles it." In other words, the 10/9 repayment should be credited to Defendants. There is also a note next to the 10/9 "NS/BofD #958" entry saying "2 EL's for $350????", which I think is a reiteration of this same comment.
	:'''2.''' "We were not responsible for GCEH costs" next to 2000-01-24 "Hostway: GCEH hosting monthly" entry, and presumably applicable to all entries regarding GCEH.		: '''2.''' "We were not responsible for GCEH costs" next to 2000-01-24 "Hostway: GCEH hosting monthly" entry, and presumably applicable to all entries regarding GCEH.
	:'''3.''' "Paid him cash from Jeremy" next to 2000-11-13 $200 entry		: '''3.''' "Paid him cash from Jeremy" next to 2000-11-13 $200 entry

	RDA also requested that a [[:Image:2000-07-29_rda_ck2271_NCO_State_Farm_Ins.jpg\|$150.00 check to State Farm]] be credited, as it was "undoubtedly a 'Staddon' account. RDA, WDG/NLG did not use State Farm. This was either paid for Nick and he paid us back or us paying him back for a short term loan from him." I have added the entry as requested on the [[SvsG:2000 Accounting\|2000 Accounting]], pending a verification of the account number, so this is no longer in dispute.		RDA also requested that a [[:Image:2000-07-29_rda_ck2271_NCO_State_Farm_Ins.jpg\|$150.00 check to State Farm]] be credited, as it was "undoubtedly a 'Staddon' account. RDA, WDG/NLG did not use State Farm. This was either paid for Nick and he paid us back or us paying him back for a short term loan from him." I have added the entry as requested on the [[SvsG:2000 Accounting\|2000 Accounting]], pending a verification of the account number, so this is no longer in dispute.

	====~~[[SvsG:2001 Accounting~~\|2001]]====		===={{l/sub\|2001}}====
	:'''4.''' "Button was Nick's cat!" next to 2001-03-10 Companion Animal Hospital entry		:'''4.''' "Button was Nick's cat!" next to 2001-03-10 Companion Animal Hospital entry
	:'''5.''' "dedicated server n/c to RDA" next to entries regarding Hostway hosting		:'''5.''' "dedicated server n/c to RDA" next to entries regarding Hostway hosting
Line 42:		Line 42:
	:'''8.''' "Additionally, Nick shows a $400 loan for drums. It was actually $600 for drums and accessories and was paid back in cash."		:'''8.''' "Additionally, Nick shows a $400 loan for drums. It was actually $600 for drums and accessories and was paid back in cash."
	:'''9.''' "Why is he charging me if he was paying me?" next to 2001/10/19 entry (NS/BofD #1181)		:'''9.''' "Why is he charging me if he was paying me?" next to 2001/10/19 entry (NS/BofD #1181)
	====~~[[SvsG:2002 Accounting~~\|2002]]====		===={{l/sub\|2002}}====
	There are some notes at the end of the 2002 listings, but it's not clear if there are any actual disputed items or just general questions.		There are some notes at the end of the 2002 listings, but it's not clear if there are any actual disputed items or just general questions.

	I'm not sure if the extensive paperwork regarding the [[Xmas CD Project]] constitutes a request to credit those expenses to the accounting. My understanding is that that was an entirely separate project, with all profits to come from sales of the resulting CD, said sales to be managed by RDA. In other words, Plaintiff was not responsible for compensating any others in the project for expenses incurred.		I'm not sure if the extensive paperwork regarding the [[Xmas CD Project]] constitutes a request to credit those expenses to the accounting. My understanding is that that was an entirely separate project, with all profits to come from sales of the resulting CD, said sales to be managed by RDA. In other words, Plaintiff was not responsible for compensating any others in the project for expenses incurred.
	====~~[[SvsG:2003 Accounting~~\|2003]]====		===={{l/sub\|2003}}====
	Note at end of 2003 printout said it was confusing because colors were reversed for debits and credits. Hopefully [[SvsG:2003 Accounting\|this]] is clearer (no colors at all). No known dispute items as of this writing.		Note at end of 2003 printout said it was confusing because colors were reversed for debits and credits. Hopefully [[SvsG:2003 Accounting\|this]] is clearer (no colors at all). No known dispute items as of this writing.

Woozle: Woozle moved page Griever/Accounting to Griever/accounting: title tweak

2015-08-15T01:48:23Z

Woozle moved page Griever/Accounting to Griever/accounting: title tweak

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 15 August 2015
(No difference)

Woozle: partial update; more to do

2015-08-15T01:48:05Z

partial update; more to do

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 15 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[Category:SvsG Documents]]~~		{{hdr/Griever/accountings}}
	~~[[Staddon vs.~~ Griever~~]]: [[SvsG:Accounting\|Accounting]]~~
	==Documents==		==Documents==
	*[[SvsG:Accounting Summary]] - yearly totals and final total		*[[SvsG:Accounting Summary]] - yearly totals and final total

Woozle: Woozle moved page SvsG:Accounting to Griever/Accounting: reorganzing

2015-08-15T01:31:39Z

Woozle moved page SvsG:Accounting to Griever/Accounting: reorganzing

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 15 August 2015
(No difference)

Woozle: /* Nick Responds */ clarification of "2 ELs???" reply

2007-02-19T17:28:24Z

Nick Responds: clarification of "2 ELs???" reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 19 February 2007
Line 51:		Line 51:

	===Nick Responds===		===Nick Responds===
	:'''1.''' "2 EL's for $350????": yes, these are 2 different checks, both from NS/BofD to WDG: [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0953.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #953]] and [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0958.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #958]].		:'''1.''' "2 EL's for $350????": yes, these are 2 different checks, both from NS/BofD to WDG: [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0953.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #953]] and [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0958.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #958]]. Both of these were checks '''from NS to Bubba''', not repayments from Bubba; any repayment would be credited as a separate transaction.
	:'''2.''' "not responsible for GCEH costs": RDA was ultimately responsible for costs incurred on behalf of GCEH, as I had no contact with GCEH; everything I did for GCEH was at Lynne's request. GCEH was not a client of any of the Plaintiffs, nor were Defendants acting as sales agents in this matter. Any and all work done or services provided for GCEH were done at the request of and on behalf of the Defendants. I agreed to allow deferral of repayment for a short time, as RDA and GCEH were both involved in charitable endeavors, but I did not agree to cover GCEH's costs indefinitely. For what it's worth, I have, credited [[:Image:2000-10-01 gceh ck0846 Red House Media.500pxh.jpg\|GCEH's payment]] to RDA's account (see [[SvsG:2000 Accounting\|2000 Accounting]]), which should cancel out the charges.		:'''2.''' "not responsible for GCEH costs": RDA was ultimately responsible for costs incurred on behalf of GCEH, as I had no contact with GCEH; everything I did for GCEH was at Lynne's request. GCEH was not a client of any of the Plaintiffs, nor were Defendants acting as sales agents in this matter. Any and all work done or services provided for GCEH were done at the request of and on behalf of the Defendants. I agreed to allow deferral of repayment for a short time, as RDA and GCEH were both involved in charitable endeavors, but I did not agree to cover GCEH's costs indefinitely. For what it's worth, I have, credited [[:Image:2000-10-01 gceh ck0846 Red House Media.500pxh.jpg\|GCEH's payment]] to RDA's account (see [[SvsG:2000 Accounting\|2000 Accounting]]), which should cancel out the charges.
	:'''3.''' "cash from Jeremy": I have entered a $200 cash repayment, date unknown, immediately underneath the $200 loan (NS/BofD #980). I had allowed for up to $500 in undocumented cash repayments at end of the [[SvsG:2003 Accounting\|2003 accounting]]; I have subtracted this $200 (since it was undocumented but is now a line item), leaving room for $300 more in undocumented cash repayments. If Defendants think that this amount significantly understates the amount of undocumented cash paid to Plaintiff, Plaintiff will want some details for each transaction (when, how much, what for).		:'''3.''' "cash from Jeremy": I have entered a $200 cash repayment, date unknown, immediately underneath the $200 loan (NS/BofD #980). I had allowed for up to $500 in undocumented cash repayments at end of the [[SvsG:2003 Accounting\|2003 accounting]]; I have subtracted this $200 (since it was undocumented but is now a line item), leaving room for $300 more in undocumented cash repayments. If Defendants think that this amount significantly understates the amount of undocumented cash paid to Plaintiff, Plaintiff will want some details for each transaction (when, how much, what for).

Woozle: /* Documents */ rearranged list a bit

2005-09-25T01:48:43Z

Documents: rearranged list a bit

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 25 September 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[Staddon vs. Griever]]: [[SvsG:Accounting\|Accounting]]		[[Staddon vs. Griever]]: [[SvsG:Accounting\|Accounting]]
	==Documents==		==Documents==
			*[[SvsG:Accounting Summary]] - yearly totals and final total
	*General Accountings:		*General Accountings:
	**[[SvsG:1997 Accounting]]		**[[SvsG:1997 Accounting]]
Line 15:		Line 16:
	**[[SvsG:Legal Fees]]		**[[SvsG:Legal Fees]]
	*"On Spec" Project:		*"On Spec" Project:
	**[[SvsG:Xmas CD Accounting]] - not yet started		**[[SvsG:Xmas CD Accounting]] - not yet started; does not affect total
			* Other related documents:
	*[[SvsG:Checks Available]]		** [[SvsG:Checks Available]]

	"Accounts" are where there was a simple agreement to provide a service in exchange for a fee. Each one ended up with a net amount due from the Defendants to the Plaintiff.		"Accounts" are where there was a simple agreement to provide a service in exchange for a fee. Each one ended up with a net amount due from the Defendants to the Plaintiff.

	The Xmas CD Project does not affect the debt situation between Plaintiffs and Defendants because it was an "on spec" investment of time and effort by all parties, in anticipation of profits from sales, with no guarantee that sales would exceed expenses. See [[Xmas CD Project]] for details.		The [[Xmas CD Project]] does not affect the debt situation between Plaintiffs and Defendants because it was an "on spec" investment of time and effort by all parties, in anticipation of profits from sales, with no guarantee that sales would exceed expenses. See [[Xmas CD Project]] for details.

	==Nick Notes==		==Nick Notes==

Woozle: /* Documents */ "xmas cd accounting not yet started"

2005-09-25T01:23:43Z

Documents: "xmas cd accounting not yet started"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:23, 25 September 2005
Line 15:		Line 15:
	**[[SvsG:Legal Fees]]		**[[SvsG:Legal Fees]]
	*"On Spec" Project:		*"On Spec" Project:
	**[[SvsG:Xmas CD Accounting]]		**[[SvsG:Xmas CD Accounting]] - not yet started

	*[[SvsG:Checks Available]]		*[[SvsG:Checks Available]]
Line 22:		Line 22:

	The Xmas CD Project does not affect the debt situation between Plaintiffs and Defendants because it was an "on spec" investment of time and effort by all parties, in anticipation of profits from sales, with no guarantee that sales would exceed expenses. See [[Xmas CD Project]] for details.		The Xmas CD Project does not affect the debt situation between Plaintiffs and Defendants because it was an "on spec" investment of time and effort by all parties, in anticipation of profits from sales, with no guarantee that sales would exceed expenses. See [[Xmas CD Project]] for details.

	==Nick Notes==		==Nick Notes==
	===RDA Disputes===		===RDA Disputes===

Woozle: /* Nick Responds */ link to accounting for GCEH check

2005-09-25T01:19:29Z

Nick Responds: link to accounting for GCEH check

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 25 September 2005
Line 50:		Line 50:
	===Nick Responds===		===Nick Responds===
	:'''1.''' "2 EL's for $350????": yes, these are 2 different checks, both from NS/BofD to WDG: [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0953.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #953]] and [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0958.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #958]].		:'''1.''' "2 EL's for $350????": yes, these are 2 different checks, both from NS/BofD to WDG: [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0953.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #953]] and [[:Image:Ns-bofd-0958.650pxh.jpg\|NS/BofD #958]].
	:'''2.''' "not responsible for GCEH costs": RDA was ultimately responsible for costs incurred on behalf of GCEH, as I had no contact with GCEH; everything I did for GCEH was at Lynne's request. GCEH was not a client of any of the Plaintiffs, nor were Defendants acting as sales agents in this matter. Any and all work done or services provided for GCEH were done at the request of and on behalf of the Defendants. I agreed to allow deferral of repayment for a short time, as RDA and GCEH were both involved in charitable endeavors, but I did not agree to cover GCEH's costs indefinitely. For what it's worth, I have, credited [[:Image:2000-10-01 gceh ck0846 Red House Media.500pxh.jpg\|GCEH's payment]] to RDA's account (see , which should cancel out the charges.		:'''2.''' "not responsible for GCEH costs": RDA was ultimately responsible for costs incurred on behalf of GCEH, as I had no contact with GCEH; everything I did for GCEH was at Lynne's request. GCEH was not a client of any of the Plaintiffs, nor were Defendants acting as sales agents in this matter. Any and all work done or services provided for GCEH were done at the request of and on behalf of the Defendants. I agreed to allow deferral of repayment for a short time, as RDA and GCEH were both involved in charitable endeavors, but I did not agree to cover GCEH's costs indefinitely. For what it's worth, I have, credited [[:Image:2000-10-01 gceh ck0846 Red House Media.500pxh.jpg\|GCEH's payment]] to RDA's account (see [[SvsG:2000 Accounting\|2000 Accounting]]), which should cancel out the charges.
	:'''3.''' "cash from Jeremy": I have entered a $200 cash repayment, date unknown, immediately underneath the $200 loan (NS/BofD #980). I had allowed for up to $500 in undocumented cash repayments at end of the [[SvsG:2003 Accounting\|2003 accounting]]; I have subtracted this $200 (since it was undocumented but is now a line item), leaving room for $300 more in undocumented cash repayments. If Defendants think that this amount significantly understates the amount of undocumented cash paid to Plaintiff, Plaintiff will want some details for each transaction (when, how much, what for).		:'''3.''' "cash from Jeremy": I have entered a $200 cash repayment, date unknown, immediately underneath the $200 loan (NS/BofD #980). I had allowed for up to $500 in undocumented cash repayments at end of the [[SvsG:2003 Accounting\|2003 accounting]]; I have subtracted this $200 (since it was undocumented but is now a line item), leaving room for $300 more in undocumented cash repayments. If Defendants think that this amount significantly understates the amount of undocumented cash paid to Plaintiff, Plaintiff will want some details for each transaction (when, how much, what for).
	:'''4.''' "Button was Nick's cat": This is incorrect.		:'''4.''' "Button was Nick's cat": This is incorrect.

Woozle: /* RDA Disputes */ link to responses

2005-09-25T01:17:16Z

RDA Disputes: link to responses

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 25 September 2005
Line 24:		Line 24:
	==Nick Notes==		==Nick Notes==
	===RDA Disputes===		===RDA Disputes===
	RDA disputes the following entries (as taken from notes on the printouts copied by the defense lawyer):		RDA disputes the following entries (as taken from notes on the printouts copied by the defense lawyer); my responses are [[#Nick Responds\|below]].
	====[[SvsG:1998 Accounting\|1998]]-[[SvsG:1999 Accounting\|1999]]====		====[[SvsG:1998 Accounting\|1998]]-[[SvsG:1999 Accounting\|1999]]====
	No known disputes as of this writing.		No known disputes as of this writing.