Griever/2005-03-23 RDA Responds to Interrogatories - Revision history

Woozle: updated links and categories

2015-08-15T18:17:58Z

updated links and categories

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 15 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{datecat\|2005-03-23}}
			[[category:Griever]]
			[[category:Griever/legal]]
	{\| align=right		{\| align=right
	\|-		\|-
	\|__TOC__		\|__TOC__
	\|}		\|}
	~~[[Category:2005-03-23]]~~
	~~[[Staddon vs. Griever]]: [[{{PAGENAME}}\|RDA Responds to Interrogatories]]~~
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	* '''Official Title''': defendant redistribution alternative inc.'s response to plaintiff's interrogatories		* '''Official Title''': defendant redistribution alternative inc.'s response to plaintiff's interrogatories
	* This document is in response to "Part 3: Request for Documents to RDA" of ~~[[SvsG:Plaintiffs' First Requests to RDA~~\|~~Plaintiffs~~' First Requests to RDA]].		* This document is in response to "Part 3: Request for Documents to RDA" of {{l/same\|Plaintiff's First Requests to RDA}}.
	* Submitted to the court on 2005-03-23; received by Plaintiff Nick on 2005-09-30.		* Submitted to the court on {{l/date\|2005-03-23}}; received by Plaintiff Nick on {{l/date\|2005-09-30}}.
	* Links have been added for purposes of cross-reference and clarity; they were not present in the original printed document.		* Links have been added for purposes of cross-reference and clarity; they were not present in the original printed document.
	* Contact information for individuals named in the responses has been omitted from this transcription for reasons of privacy.		* Contact information for individuals named in the responses has been omitted from this transcription for reasons of privacy.

Woozle: Woozle moved page SvsG:2005-03-23 RDA Responds to Interrogatories to Griever/2005-03-23 RDA Responds to Interrogatories: reorganizing

2015-08-15T18:16:26Z

Woozle moved page SvsG:2005-03-23 RDA Responds to Interrogatories to Griever/2005-03-23 RDA Responds to Interrogatories: reorganizing

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 15 August 2015
(No difference)

Woozle: /* Contents */ updated OCGA links

2006-11-18T21:02:07Z

Contents: updated OCGA links

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 18 November 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	==Contents==		==Contents==
	I hereby serve upon you the following answers of Defendant Redistribution Alternative, Inc. to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section {{~~OCGA code~~\|9-11-33}}.		I hereby serve upon you the following answers of Defendant Redistribution Alternative, Inc. to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section {{gacode\|9\|11\|33}}.
	===OBJECTION TO PREAMBLE===		===OBJECTION TO PREAMBLE===
	To the extent that the preamble to the interrogatories of the Plaintiff seeks to impose upon the Defendant any duties or requirements in the excess of those specified by the appropriate provisions of the [[Georgia Civil Practice Act]], the Defendant objects to same. Defendant objects to each of the Plaintiffs' interrogatories to the extent that they seek information regarding communications between Defendant and legal counsel on the grounds that such communications are privileged and are not subject to discovery or seek information regarding materials prepared by or for Defendant or Defendant's representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial on the grounds that Plaintiff has not made the required showing for the discovery of such work product material under O.C.G.A. §{{~~OCGA code~~\|9-11-26}}(b)(3) or which seeks information already in the possession of Plaintiff.		To the extent that the preamble to the interrogatories of the Plaintiff seeks to impose upon the Defendant any duties or requirements in the excess of those specified by the appropriate provisions of the [[Georgia Civil Practice Act]], the Defendant objects to same. Defendant objects to each of the Plaintiffs' interrogatories to the extent that they seek information regarding communications between Defendant and legal counsel on the grounds that such communications are privileged and are not subject to discovery or seek information regarding materials prepared by or for Defendant or Defendant's representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial on the grounds that Plaintiff has not made the required showing for the discovery of such work product material under O.C.G.A. §{{gacode\|9\|11\|26}}(b)(3) or which seeks information already in the possession of Plaintiff.
	===Responses===		===Responses===
	====1.====		====1.====

Woozle: /* Contents */ template for OCGA; re-indenting of responses

2005-10-03T10:57:31Z

Contents: template for OCGA; re-indenting of responses

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 3 October 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:

	==Contents==		==Contents==
	I hereby serve upon you the following answers of Defendant Redistribution Alternative, Inc. to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section ~~[http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?~~code~~=9-11-33~~ 9-11-33].		I hereby serve upon you the following answers of Defendant Redistribution Alternative, Inc. to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section {{OCGA code\|9-11-33}}.
	===OBJECTION TO PREAMBLE===		===OBJECTION TO PREAMBLE===
	To the extent that the preamble to the interrogatories of the Plaintiff seeks to impose upon the Defendant any duties or requirements in the excess of those specified by the appropriate provisions of the [[Georgia Civil Practice Act]], the Defendant objects to same. Defendant objects to each of the Plaintiffs' interrogatories to the extent that they seek information regarding communications between Defendant and legal counsel on the grounds that such communications are privileged and are not subject to discovery or seek information regarding materials prepared by or for Defendant or Defendant's representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial on the grounds that Plaintiff has not made the required showing for the discovery of such work product material under O.C.G.A. §~~[http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?~~code=9-11-26 ~~9-11-26]~~(b)(3) or which seeks information already in the possession of Plaintiff.		To the extent that the preamble to the interrogatories of the Plaintiff seeks to impose upon the Defendant any duties or requirements in the excess of those specified by the appropriate provisions of the [[Georgia Civil Practice Act]], the Defendant objects to same. Defendant objects to each of the Plaintiffs' interrogatories to the extent that they seek information regarding communications between Defendant and legal counsel on the grounds that such communications are privileged and are not subject to discovery or seek information regarding materials prepared by or for Defendant or Defendant's representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial on the grounds that Plaintiff has not made the required showing for the discovery of such work product material under O.C.G.A. §{{OCGA code\|9-11-26}}(b)(3) or which seeks information already in the possession of Plaintiff.
	===1.===		===Responses===
			====1.====
	The merchandise tha was purchased to be sold through VBZ.NET has always belonged to RDA.		The merchandise tha was purchased to be sold through VBZ.NET has always belonged to RDA.
	===2.===		====2.====
	The plaintiff has a record of the items sold through the store and the names and addresses of those who bought the merchandise.		The plaintiff has a record of the items sold through the store and the names and addresses of those who bought the merchandise.
	===3.===		====3.====
	A list of persons familiar with the business relationship of the parties includes but is not limited to:		A list of persons familiar with the business relationship of the parties includes but is not limited to:
	*Nick Staddon (Durham, NC)		*Nick Staddon (Durham, NC)
Line 33:		Line 34:
	*Scott Pelletier Stephanos		*Scott Pelletier Stephanos
	*John Kisiah (Asheville, NC)		*John Kisiah (Asheville, NC)
	===4.===		====4.====
	See above.		See above.
	===5.===		====5.====
	See documents which are or will be produced by Defendant.		See documents which are or will be produced by Defendant.
	===6.===		====6.====
	Defendant has no such written or recorded documents.		Defendant has no such written or recorded documents.
	===7.===		====7.====
	As discovery is still ongoing at this early stage of litigation, Defendant has not yet determined who, if anyone, it will call as an expert witness at the trial of this case.		As discovery is still ongoing at this early stage of litigation, Defendant has not yet determined who, if anyone, it will call as an expert witness at the trial of this case.
	===8.===		====8.====
	None.		None.
	===9.===		====9.====
	None.		None.
	===10.===		====10.====
	Not applicable.		Not applicable.
	===11.===		====11.====
	None.		None.
	----		----
	This 23 day of March, 2005.		This 23 day of March, 2005.

Woozle: /* Notes */ aesthetics

2005-10-03T01:41:42Z

Notes: aesthetics

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 3 October 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	* '''Official Title''': defendant redistribution alternative inc.'s response to plaintiff's interrogatories		* '''Official Title''': defendant redistribution alternative inc.'s response to plaintiff's interrogatories
	* This document is in response to ~~Part 3 (~~"Part 3: Request for Documents to RDA") of [[SvsG:Plaintiffs' First Requests to RDA]].		* This document is in response to "Part 3: Request for Documents to RDA" of [[SvsG:Plaintiffs' First Requests to RDA\|Plaintiffs' First Requests to RDA]].
	* Submitted to the court on 2005-03-23; received by Plaintiff Nick on 2005-09-30.		* Submitted to the court on 2005-03-23; received by Plaintiff Nick on 2005-09-30.
	* Links have been added for purposes of cross-reference and clarity; they were not present in the original printed document.		* Links have been added for purposes of cross-reference and clarity; they were not present in the original printed document.
	* Contact information for individuals named in the responses has been omitted from this transcription for reasons of privacy.		* Contact information for individuals named in the responses has been omitted from this transcription for reasons of privacy.

	==Contents==		==Contents==
	I hereby serve upon you the following answers of Defendant Redistribution Alternative, Inc. to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section [http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?code=9-11-33 9-11-33].		I hereby serve upon you the following answers of Defendant Redistribution Alternative, Inc. to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section [http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?code=9-11-33 9-11-33].

Woozle at 21:05, 2 October 2005

2005-10-02T21:05:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 2 October 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	* '''Official Title''': defendant redistribution alternative inc.'s response to plaintiff's interrogatories		* '''Official Title''': defendant redistribution alternative inc.'s response to plaintiff's interrogatories
	* This document is in response to Part 2 ("~~Interrogatories~~ to RDA") of [[SvsG:Plaintiffs' First Requests to RDA]]		* This document is in response to Part 3 ("Part 3: Request for Documents to RDA") of [[SvsG:Plaintiffs' First Requests to RDA]].
	* Submitted to the court on 2005-03-23; received by Plaintiff Nick on 2005-09-30.		* Submitted to the court on 2005-03-23; received by Plaintiff Nick on 2005-09-30.
	* Links have been added for purposes of cross-reference and clarity; they were not present in the original printed document.		* Links have been added for purposes of cross-reference and clarity; they were not present in the original printed document.
Line 15:		Line 15:
	===OBJECTION TO PREAMBLE===		===OBJECTION TO PREAMBLE===
	To the extent that the preamble to the interrogatories of the Plaintiff seeks to impose upon the Defendant any duties or requirements in the excess of those specified by the appropriate provisions of the [[Georgia Civil Practice Act]], the Defendant objects to same. Defendant objects to each of the Plaintiffs' interrogatories to the extent that they seek information regarding communications between Defendant and legal counsel on the grounds that such communications are privileged and are not subject to discovery or seek information regarding materials prepared by or for Defendant or Defendant's representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial on the grounds that Plaintiff has not made the required showing for the discovery of such work product material under O.C.G.A. §[http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?code=9-11-26 9-11-26](b)(3) or which seeks information already in the possession of Plaintiff.		To the extent that the preamble to the interrogatories of the Plaintiff seeks to impose upon the Defendant any duties or requirements in the excess of those specified by the appropriate provisions of the [[Georgia Civil Practice Act]], the Defendant objects to same. Defendant objects to each of the Plaintiffs' interrogatories to the extent that they seek information regarding communications between Defendant and legal counsel on the grounds that such communications are privileged and are not subject to discovery or seek information regarding materials prepared by or for Defendant or Defendant's representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial on the grounds that Plaintiff has not made the required showing for the discovery of such work product material under O.C.G.A. §[http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?code=9-11-26 9-11-26](b)(3) or which seeks information already in the possession of Plaintiff.
	====1.====		===1.===
	The merchandise tha was purchased to be sold through VBZ.NET has always belonged to RDA.		The merchandise tha was purchased to be sold through VBZ.NET has always belonged to RDA.
	====2.====		===2.===
	The plaintiff has a record of the items sold through the store and the names and addresses of those who bought the merchandise.		The plaintiff has a record of the items sold through the store and the names and addresses of those who bought the merchandise.
	====3.====		===3.===
	A list of persons familiar with the business relationship of the parties includes but is not limited to:		A list of persons familiar with the business relationship of the parties includes but is not limited to:
	*Nick Staddon (Durham, NC)		*Nick Staddon (Durham, NC)
Line 32:		Line 32:
	*Scott Pelletier Stephanos		*Scott Pelletier Stephanos
	*John Kisiah (Asheville, NC)		*John Kisiah (Asheville, NC)
	====4.====		===4.===
	See above.		See above.
	====5.====		===5.===
	See documents which are or will be produced by Defendant.		See documents which are or will be produced by Defendant.
	====6.====		===6.===
	Defendant has no such written or recorded documents.		Defendant has no such written or recorded documents.
	====7.====		===7.===
	As discovery is still ongoing at this early stage of litigation, Defendant has not yet determined who, if anyone, it will call as an expert witness at the trial of this case.		As discovery is still ongoing at this early stage of litigation, Defendant has not yet determined who, if anyone, it will call as an expert witness at the trial of this case.
	====8.====		===8.===
	None.		None.
	====9.====		===9.===
	None.		None.
	====10.====		===10.===
	Not applicable.		Not applicable.
	====11.====		===11.===
	None.		None.
	----		----
	This 23 day of March, 2005.		This 23 day of March, 2005.

Woozle at 20:34, 2 October 2005

2005-10-02T20:34:15Z

New page

{| align=right
|-
|__TOC__
|}
[[Category:2005-03-23]]
[[Staddon vs. Griever]]: [[{{PAGENAME}}|RDA Responds to Interrogatories]]
==Notes==
* '''Official Title''': defendant redistribution alternative inc.'s response to plaintiff's interrogatories
* This document is in response to Part 2 ("Interrogatories to RDA") of [[SvsG:Plaintiffs' First Requests to RDA]]
* Submitted to the court on 2005-03-23; received by Plaintiff Nick on 2005-09-30.
* Links have been added for purposes of cross-reference and clarity; they were not present in the original printed document.
* Contact information for individuals named in the responses has been omitted from this transcription for reasons of privacy.
==Contents==
I hereby serve upon you the following answers of Defendant Redistribution Alternative, Inc. to Plaintiffs' First Interrogatories pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section [http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?code=9-11-33 9-11-33].
===OBJECTION TO PREAMBLE===
To the extent that the preamble to the interrogatories of the Plaintiff seeks to impose upon the Defendant any duties or requirements in the excess of those specified by the appropriate provisions of the [[Georgia Civil Practice Act]], the Defendant objects to same. Defendant objects to each of the Plaintiffs' interrogatories to the extent that they seek information regarding communications between Defendant and legal counsel on the grounds that such communications are privileged and are not subject to discovery or seek information regarding materials prepared by or for Defendant or Defendant's representatives in anticipation of litigation or for trial on the grounds that Plaintiff has not made the required showing for the discovery of such work product material under O.C.G.A. §[http://www.legis.state.ga.us/cgi-bin/gl_codes_detail.pl?code=9-11-26 9-11-26](b)(3) or which seeks information already in the possession of Plaintiff.
====1.====
The merchandise tha was purchased to be sold through VBZ.NET has always belonged to RDA.
====2.====
The plaintiff has a record of the items sold through the store and the names and addresses of those who bought the merchandise.
====3.====
A list of persons familiar with the business relationship of the parties includes but is not limited to:
*Nick Staddon (Durham, NC)
*Livia Wade (Athens, GA)
*Frank Whitehill (Monroe, GA)
*Jessica Whitehill (Monroe, GA)
*Cimmeria Griever (Athens, GA)
*Angela Griever (Athens, GA)
*Jody Moore
*Jeremy Moore (Mt. Airey, GA)
*Juliet Easton
*Scott Pelletier Stephanos
*John Kisiah (Asheville, NC)
====4.====
See above.
====5.====
See documents which are or will be produced by Defendant.
====6.====
Defendant has no such written or recorded documents.
====7.====
As discovery is still ongoing at this early stage of litigation, Defendant has not yet determined who, if anyone, it will call as an expert witness at the trial of this case.
====8.====
None.
====9.====
None.
====10.====
Not applicable.
====11.====
None.
----
This 23 day of March, 2005.